Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22564

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
SHABEEN ALI KALATHINGALTHODI – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 44118 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.O.D.SIVADAS
For the Respondents: SRI. SAJU J.VALLYARA, SMT. DEVISHREE - GP

Writ petition dismissed due to becoming infructuous owing to subsequent developments.

Headnote:In this case concerning WP

(C) No. 44118 of 2023, the High Court addressed the procedural relevance of a writ petition. The court noted that subsequent developments rendered the matter infructuous, leading to a dismissal. The final outcome stated that, 'The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.'

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22564

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, JSHABEEN ALI KALATHINGALTHODI – AppellantVersusTHE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM – RespondentWP(C) NO. 44118 OF 2023

Writ petition dismissed due to becoming infructuous owing to subsequent developments.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
SHABEEN ALI KALATHINGALTHODI – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 44118 OF 2023