Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22564
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
SHABEEN ALI KALATHINGALTHODI – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 44118 OF 2023
Important Points
Writ petition dismissed due to becoming infructuous owing to subsequent developments.
Subject
Civil - Writ Petition
Headnote
In this case concerning WP
(C) No. 44118 of 2023, the High Court addressed the procedural relevance of a writ petition. The court noted that subsequent developments rendered the matter infructuous, leading to a dismissal. The final outcome stated that, 'The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.'
(C) No. 44118 of 2023, the High Court addressed the procedural relevance of a writ petition. The court noted that subsequent developments rendered the matter infructuous, leading to a dismissal. The final outcome stated that, 'The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.'
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.O.D.SIVADAS
For the Respondents: SRI. SAJU J.VALLYARA, SMT. DEVISHREE - GP
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.O.D.SIVADAS
For the Respondents: SRI. SAJU J.VALLYARA, SMT. DEVISHREE - GP
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
