Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22651
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
KRISHNAKUMAR .A – Appellant
Versus
ALMALIK JEWELLERRY PUTHENPALLY THRISSUR-1, UNIT OF AI. MUKTHADEER GOLD & DIAMONDS MANUFACTURING & WHOLE SALE JEWELLERRY GROUP, INDIA – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 647 OF 2026 | OS NO.50 OF 2025
Important Points
Subject
Civil - Civil Procedure
Headnote
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.K.K.RAZIA
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. notice not returned, need for timely disposal. (Para 1) |
| 2. judicial officer reports two months required for disposal. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
Even though notice was issued to the 1st respondent, it has not been returned after service. In view of the order that is proposed to be issued, it is not necessary to complete service of notice on the 1st respondent.
2. The prayer in this original petition is for an early disposal of I.A.No.2/2025 in O.S.No.50/2025 on the file of the Additional Sub Court I, Thrissur. This Court had called for a report from the Judicial Officer regarding the time required to dispose of the application. The Judicial Officer has reported that two months' time will be required, excluding the period of vacation, to dispose of I.A.No.2/2025 in O.S.No.50/2025.
In view of the report, this original petition is disposed of directing the Additional Sub Judge I, Thrissur to consider and pass orders on I.A.No.2/2025 in O.S.No.50/2025, at the earliest, at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment excluding the period of vacation.
