Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22707

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
T.R.RADHAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7429 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.S.SAJEEV KUMAR, SMT.BISMI T.A., SRI.RAMESH.P.N., SMT.ANSILA C.A., SHRI.EBEE ANTONY, SMT.SARAH JOSEPH, SMT.HANEENA
For the Respondents: SMT. AMMINIKUTTY K., SR.GP

Court can dismiss writ petition as infructuous if the matter is resolved by interim order.

Headnote:The court analyzed the petition filed under WP

(C) and noted that due to the interim order, the matter had become infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, underscoring the procedural aspect of dismissals in civil petitions when the original cause of action is no longer relevant.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the matter has become infructuous pursuant to the interim order.

In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22707

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JT.R.RADHAKRISHNAN – AppellantVersusTHE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION – RespondentWP(C) NO. 7429 OF 2026

Court can dismiss writ petition as infructuous if the matter is resolved by interim order.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
T.R.RADHAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7429 OF 2026