Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22707
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
T.R.RADHAKRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7429 OF 2026
Important Points
Court can dismiss writ petition as infructuous if the matter is resolved by interim order.
Subject
Civil - Writ Petition
Headnote
The court analyzed the petition filed under WP
(C) and noted that due to the interim order, the matter had become infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, underscoring the procedural aspect of dismissals in civil petitions when the original cause of action is no longer relevant.
(C) and noted that due to the interim order, the matter had become infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, underscoring the procedural aspect of dismissals in civil petitions when the original cause of action is no longer relevant.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.S.SAJEEV KUMAR, SMT.BISMI T.A., SRI.RAMESH.P.N., SMT.ANSILA C.A., SHRI.EBEE ANTONY, SMT.SARAH JOSEPH, SMT.HANEENA
For the Respondents: SMT. AMMINIKUTTY K., SR.GP
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.S.SAJEEV KUMAR, SMT.BISMI T.A., SRI.RAMESH.P.N., SMT.ANSILA C.A., SHRI.EBEE ANTONY, SMT.SARAH JOSEPH, SMT.HANEENA
For the Respondents: SMT. AMMINIKUTTY K., SR.GP
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the matter has become infructuous pursuant to the interim order.
In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
