SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22784

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
YAHYA P. – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 24679 OF 2023



The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous, allowing the petitioner to approach authorities for any surviving grievances.

Headnote:The court observed that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous, leading to dismissal without prejudice. The petitioner retains the right to approach concerned authorities for any surviving grievance. The relevant details supporting this conclusion can be found in the court's consideration of the case.

JUDGMENT

On going through the averments in the Writ Petition and after hearing the learned Government Pleader, it appears that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner is having any surviving grievance, it will be open to him to approach the concerned authorities or to prefer a review petition.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top