SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 22787

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
AJI – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 27478 OF 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.V.THAMBAN
For the Respondents: SMT. DEVISHREE

The court may dismiss a Writ Petition as infructuous if it no longer presents any relevant issues.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The Writ Petition was filed under the relevant provisions of law concerning civil matters. Facts of the Case: The petitioner, Aji, claimed that the petition had become infructuous.

Findings of Court:
The Court accepted counsel's submission and determined the petition to be infructuous.

Issues: The Court evaluated the status of the Writ Petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court stated that the Writ Petition has no further relevance, leading to its dismissal.

Result: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top