KARYAT DRY DOCK WORKS AND BOATYARD vs REGISTERING AUTHORITY KERALA MARITIME BOARD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
KARYAT DRY DOCK WORKS AND BOATYARD – Appellant
Versus
REGISTERING AUTHORITY KERALA MARITIME BOARD – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MATHEWS P.GEORGE, SHRI.K.M.GEORGE, KUM.CHITHRA P.GEORGE, SHRI.ABIN THOMAS ALEX
For the Respondents: K.P.SUDHEER, SC, SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN, SMT.PINKU MARIAM JOSE, SMT.K.M.FATHIMA, SMT.NICHU WILLINGTON, SHRI.H. KASHYAP SESHADRI

Table of Content
1. petitioner withdraws writ petition. (Para 1)
2. writ petition dismissed allowing for withdrawal. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

2. Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JKARYAT DRY DOCK WORKS AND BOATYARD – AppellantVersusREGISTERING AUTHORITY KERALA MARITIME BOARD – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
KARYAT DRY DOCK WORKS AND BOATYARD – Appellant
Versus
REGISTERING AUTHORITY KERALA MARITIME BOARD – Respondent