SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
KARYAT DRY DOCK WORKS AND BOATYARD – Appellant
Versus
REGISTERING AUTHORITY KERALA MARITIME BOARD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7027 OF 2026



Important Points

The court allows the withdrawal of a writ petition with the liberty to approach an appropriate forum.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Headnote

The judgment pertains to WP

(C) No. 7027 of 2026, where the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to approach an appropriate forum. The court observed that the dismissal allows for such liberty. The case highlights the procedural aspect of withdrawal of petitions in civil matters under relevant statutes. The petitioner was represented by multiple advocates, and the respondents included official authorities and private entities, each represented by their counsel.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MATHEWS P.GEORGE, SHRI.K.M.GEORGE, KUM.CHITHRA P.GEORGE, SHRI.ABIN THOMAS ALEX
For the Respondents: K.P.SUDHEER, SC, SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN, SMT.PINKU MARIAM JOSE, SMT.K.M.FATHIMA, SMT.NICHU WILLINGTON, SHRI.H. KASHYAP SESHADRI

Table of Content
1. petitioner withdraws writ petition. (Para 1)
2. writ petition dismissed allowing for withdrawal. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

2. Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top