SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23028

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
.......... .......... .......... – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3332 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS
For the Respondents: SMT.P.M.SHAHIDA

Where a dispute between parties is amicably settled and the victim does not wish to proceed, the court may quash ongoing criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for quashing proceedings against the accused in Crime No. 811 of 2016, alleging rape under Section 376(2)(n) IPC. The court finds that the entire dispute has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. The court proceeded to quash further proceedings on the grounds that continuing them would abuse the court process. The final result allows the petitioner's request, quashing ongoing proceedings.

Table of Content
1. petition under section 482 ipc to quash charges. (Para 1 , 2)
2. settlement between parties indicates no further prosecution intention. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's discretion to quash when continuing prosecution is an abuse of process. (Para 6)

ORDER

Dated this the 24th day of March, 2026 This is a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , by the accused in Crime No. 811 of 2016 of Feroke Police Station, which is pending as L.P. No. 12 of 2024 in C.P. No. 27 of 2022 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-V, Kozhikode praying for quashing the proceedings against him. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioner is punishable under Section 376 (2)(n) of the IPC . The prosecution case is that, the accused after promising to marry the defacto complainant, repeatedly committed rape upon her since 03.05.2016 and thereby she became pregnant.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner now the entire dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant has been settled. The learned counsel for the petitioner would argue that even if the prosecution case as such is believed, the same will not constitute any offence as the alleged relationship consensual one. Therefore, according to the learned counsel, further proceedings in the case will not yield any fruitful result and it will only be a futile exercise. Further, according to him, the matter has been settled with the defacto complainant. Therefore, he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.

4. The Defacto complainant/victim filed an affidavit endorsing the averments in the Criminal MC. According to her, the matter has been amicably settled, that she does not intend to proceed with the case and also that further proceedings in the case can be quashed. She has no further grievance against the petitioner.

5. The petition was opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor. However, after getting instruction from the SHO, he further submitted that, the dispute has been settled between the parties and that the victim is not at all interested in continuing the prosecution against the petitioners.

6. On a perusal of the FI statement, it can be seen that accompanied him to a lodge on different dates and they had sexual relationship with each other. Therefore, the relationship between them prima facie appears to have been a consensual one. Moreover, now the entire dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant has been settled and the defacto complainant filed an affidavit to that effect. In the above circumstances, no purpose will be served in continuing the prosecution against the petitioner, as it will only be an abuse of the process of the court. Therefore, this Crl.M.C is liable to be allowed.

In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. All further proceedings against the petitioner in L.P. No. 12 of 2024 in C.P. No. 27 of 2022 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-V, Kozhikode arising from Crime No. 811 of 2016 of Feroke Police Station, is quashed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top