Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
RAMEES K.P. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction and sentencing process (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. credibility of witness testimony (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's reasoning and evidence consideration (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. final judgment and sentence modification (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the accused in CC No.229 of 2008 on the files of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thalassery. He was convicted and sentenced by the learned Magistrate in the aforesaid case under Section 392 IPC to Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years. In the appeal filed, the learned Additional Sessions Judge IV, Thalassery, confirmed the conviction but reduced the sentence to Rigorous Imprisonment for three years. Aggrieved by the above concurrent verdicts of conviction and the modified sentence awarded by the Appellate Court, the petitioner is here before this Court with this revision.
2. Since there was consecutive non-representation on the part of the revision petitioner, Adv. Mr. Junaid V.S was appointed as Amicus Curiae to represent the revision petitioner.
3. Heard the learned Amicus Curiae representing the revision petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.
4. The prosecution case is that on 24.03.200
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
