Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.B. SNEHALATHA, J
ABOOBACKER SIDHIQUE @ SUDHEER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing facts of the accused's trespass and theft. (Para 2 , 3 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. corroboration of prosecution evidence and affirming of conviction. (Para 6 , 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. arguments regarding evidence and sentencing options. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 23) |
| 4. legal grounds for sentencing decisions regarding concurrent terms. (Para 24) |
| 5. final ruling on the dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 25) |
O R D E R
Revision petitioner/accused challenges the judgment in Crl.A No.202/2013 of Sessions Court, Manjeri by which it confirmed the conviction and sentence against the accused in C.C.No.118/2010 of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court II, Perinthalmanna.
2. The prosecution case is that on 22.9.2008 at about 3.30 am, accused committed lurking house trespass into the house bearing No.III/205 of Pulamanthole Panchayat belonging to PW4 and committed theft of 52 grams of gold ornaments after break opening the lock of almirah and thereby committed the offences punishable under Sections
457, 380 and 461 of Indian Penal Code (for short ' IPC ').
3. Pursuant to Ext.P3 first information statement laid by PW4, the crime was registered. After completing the investigation, PW7 file
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
