Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
ANTONY M.J. – Appellant
Versus
THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and use of agricultural land. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. court's analysis on statutory compliance and previous judgments. (Para 5 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. contentions raised by parties regarding land classification. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. final order regarding the writ petition. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the owner of an extent of 37.39 Ares in Re-Survey No. 54, Block No. 139 of Perumbavoor Village, which was purchased by the petitioner through a sale deed dated 04.07.2007. The petitioner has approached this Court, being aggrieved by the issuance of Ext.P5 order by the Land Revenue Commissioner.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the property was being cultivated with banana plantain even at the time of its purchase by the petitioner, and that there was no paddy cultivation at all. Since the property was not suitable for paddy cultivation, the petitioner sought permission to continue cultivating other crops such as banana plantain. Consequently, the Village Officer submitted Ext.P2 report dated 10.11.2007, stating that the petitioner’s property is not fit for paddy cultivation and that other crops, including banana plantain, can be cultivated.
3. On 20.05.2015
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
