SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23317

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
THE EAST ERNAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1019 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.RAKESH
For the Respondents: SHRI.NAVANEETH.N.NATH, CGC, SMT.G. SHEEBA, GP, SRI.B.S.SURESH KUMAR, SC, SRI.ASHLEY JOHN, SMT.RANJANA V., SMT.ANUSREE C.S., SHRI.JAISON MATHEW

The Court upheld the petitioner's right to operate their account within the limits of the lien while ensuring compliance with requisition directives.

Headnote:The judgment relates to a Writ Petition filed by a Service Co-operative Bank seeking removal of a lien on its account. The Court found that the requisitions for freezing funds were valid. The Court directed the Bank to limit the lien to a specified amount and communicate requisition details to enable compliance. Key issues addressed include the rights of the Bank to operate its account, obligations for future requisitions, and grievance mechanisms available for affected parties. The final verdict granted the Bank the rights to operate within set limits while addressing all requisition compliance requirements verbatim.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks relief from lien. (Para 1)
2. court references prior relevant case. (Para 2)
3. details on requisitions and amounts discussed. (Para 3)
4. judicial directives issued to manage the lien. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

1. Petitioner is a Service Co-operative Bank which has filed this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the Respondent No.5/Bank to remove or lift the lien/hold/freeze effected in the account maintained by the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank with the Respondent No.5. The Respondents Nos.4 and 7 to 14 are various Police Authorities which are made parties in the Writ Petition alleging that they have issued Requisitions for lien/freeze/hold with respect to the account of the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank maintained with the Respondent No.5.

2. This Court had considered a similar issue in Kunnamangalam Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd. (M/s.) v. Inspector of Police, Cyber Police Station South Region, Brihan [2026 KHC

179], and the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank is also entitled to get the same directions.

3. Learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent No.5 submitted that the Respondent No.5 received the requisitions from the Respondents Nos.4 and 7 to 14 for a total amount of Rs.3,88,500/-. In view of the said submission, the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank can be permitted to operate its account maintained with Respondent No.5, limiting the lien/hold/freeze to Rs.3,88,500/-. In order to enable the Petitioner/Co- operative Bank to identify the accounts of its Account Holders which are involved in the disputed transactions and to effect corresponding lien/hold/freeze for the amounts stated in the Requisitions, Respondent No.5/Bank has to furnish all the details of the Requisitions, including the transaction IDs, to the Petitioner/Co-

operative Bank. On getting those details, it is for the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank to act swiftly and effect lien/hold/freeze for the amounts shown in the Requisitions in the respective accounts of its Account Holders in order to prevent loss of the disputed amounts from the financial system.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:

The Respondent No.5/Bank is directed to permit the i)

Petitioner/Co-operative Bank to operate the account maintained by the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank with the Respondent No.5, limiting the lien to Rs.3,88,500/-.

The Respondent No.5/Bank is directed to ii)

communicate the details of the requisitions, including the transaction IDs, to the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank so as to enable the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank to effect lien/hold/freeze for the amounts shown in the Requisitions in the respective accounts of its Account Holders.

The Petitioner/Co-operative Bank is directed to effect iii)

lien for the amounts shown in the Requisitions so communicated by the Respondent No.5/Bank in the respective accounts of its Account Holders.

In case of receipt of future Requisitions by the iv)

Respondent No.5 with respect to the account of the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank maintained with the Respondent No.5, the Respondent No.5 shall continue to permit the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank to operate its account, limiting the lien/hold/freeze to the amounts shown in the Requisitions.

In case of receipt of future Requisitions also, the v)

Respondent No.5 shall immediately forward all the details to the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank and the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank shall effect the corresponding lien/hold/freeze in the respective accounts of its Account Holders.

The amounts which are kept under lien/hold/freeze in vi)

the account of the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank maintained with Respondent No.5 shall be subject to the Orders passed by the jurisdictional Magistrate.

If the Respondent No.5 receives any Court Order to vii)

transfer the lien amount from the Account of the Petitioner/Co-operative Bank, the same shall be done only after giving sufficient Notice to the Petitioner/Co- operative Bank in order to enable the Petitioner/Co-

operative Bank

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top