Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
J. Nisha Banu, Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ
RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
DIVYA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the marriage and claims for gold and maintenance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court dismisses case due to appellant's failure to represent. (Para 4) |
| 3. final order of dismissal for default. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Nisha Banu, J.
This appeal is filed seeking to set aside the judgment dated 24.07.2014 passed by the Family Court, Nedumangad, in O.P.No.1231 of 2011 filed by the petitioners, who is the respondents herein, for claiming gold and money from the appellant herein, who is the respondent in the original petition. The appellant had married the 1st respondent on
20.08.2007 and 2nd respondent born in the wedlock.
2. The brief facts of the case as narrated by the appellant is that the appellant is the husband and the respondent is the wife. O.P.No.1231 of 2011 was filed by the wife/1st respondent claiming gold and money from the appellant/husband.
3. The case of the 1st respondent/wife in brief is that the appellant/husband married the 1st respondent on 20.08.2007 and during the time of marriage, the 1st respondent/wife’s parents gave 25 sovereigns of gold ornaments and Rs.2,00,000/- by way of pocket money to the appellant/husband and according to the 1st responden
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
