SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23405

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
LUKMAN HAKKIM – Appellant
Versus
SHRI. JAYAPRASAD, SMT. BISMI – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 226 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.19057 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI. RAJ CAROLIN V.

A court may close a contempt case if it finds that prior judgments have been complied with.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to Contempt Case (Civil) No. 226 of 2026, wherein the court examined compliance with a prior judgment from WP

(C) No. 19057 of 2025. The petitioner asserted that compliance had been achieved, leading the court to record this submission and subsequently close the contempt case. The court found sufficient cause to conclude the matter without further proceedings.

JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the judgment has already been complied with.

The submission is recorded and the contempt case is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top