SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23555

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SAJI T.A. @ MUHAMMED SALEEM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1823 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.E.SAJAL, SHRI.MUHAMMED HISHAM T., SMT.FATHIMA RINSHA T.P.
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PP

The court determines eligibility for bail based on sufficient grounds for continued detention under explosive-related charges.

Headnote:This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail. The applicants are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.94/2026, charged with offences under Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 for unlawfully transporting explosives. The court found no sufficient grounds to continue judicial custody after reviewing the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The court allowed the bail application on specified conditions.

Table of Content
1. summary of facts regarding the accused and alleged offences. (Para 2)
2. arguments for and against granting bail from both sides. (Para 4 , 5)
3. judicial decision on the bail application and conditions imposed. (Para 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS )

seeking regular bail.

2. The applicants are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.94/2026 of Tirurangadi Police Station, Malappuram District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 4 and

5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

07.02.2026 at 12:10 a.m., at Chemmad-Thalappara Road, accused Nos.1 to 3 unlawfully transported and stored 448 boxes containing 89,600 explosive sticks and 35 boxes containing 10,500 shock tubes (NONEL). These items were kept in a lorry bearing registration number KL-10-BF-8395, inside the compound of Farha Hollow Bricks Company. The accused acted with the knowledge that these were explosive substances, in contravention of the provisions of the Explosive Substances Act. Thus, the applicants are alleged to have committed the above offences.

4. I have heard Sri.P. E. Sajal, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.M.C. Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and they are not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicants were remanded to judicial custody on 10.02.2026. The investigation is almost over. The recovery has been effected. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicants is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicants shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicants shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicants shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m every Saturday until further orders. They shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicants shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicants shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top