Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
SHAJEEVAN P.S. – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenging eviction for acquired land. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments presented by respondents regarding land ownership. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's decision to dismiss the writ petition. (Para 4) |
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 31st day of March, 2026 Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P3 series issued by the 2nd respondent demanding him to vacate his property having an extent of 0.34 ares comprised in survey no.1191/5; 0.10 ares comprised in survey no.906/6 and 0.04 ares comprised in survey no.906/9 of Ernakulam Village. The said property was acquired by the 1st respondent through the 2nd respondent for the IInd phase of Atlantis Railway Over Bridge project. An Award was passed and the compensation amount was deposited before the District and Sessions Court, Ernakulam. The name of the 3rd respondent was also included in the Awardee column. In such circumstances, the petitioner submitted a representation under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 , seeking release of compensation and specifically requesting that he may not be dispossessed until its consideration.
Nevertheless, the 2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
