Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MURALI MENON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedure for bail in the context of a non-bailable warrant. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's provision for timely consideration of bail applications upon surrender. (Para 3) |
C.S.DIAS, J.
---------------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No. 3007 of 2026 -----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 31st day of March, 2026 ORDER The petitioner is the accused in CC No.485/2016 on the file of the Special Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate for the Trial of Cases under Section 138 of the NI Act, 1881, Ernakulam (Trial Court), which has been filed by the 2nd respondent alleging the commission of the offence punishable under of the Negotiable Instruments Act .
2. The petitioner has stated in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case that, although he had got himself enlarged on bail, there was no sitting in the Trial Court. Subsequently, he did not appear before the said Court. The petitioner has learnt that a non-bailable warrant has been issued against him. The petitioner is suffering from various ailments. The petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the Trial Court and get himself enlarged on bail. However, the petitioner is apprehensive that his appli
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
