SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23605

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
THE MANAGER ( K.S. MOHAMMED BASHEER HAJI) – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SRI.M.SAJJAD
For the Respondents: GP HARITHA V A

JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by Exts.P3(c), P4(c) and P5(c) orders rejecting approval of appointment of respondents 5 to 7, the petitioner – Manager has preferred Exts.P3(d), P4(d) and P5(d) revision petitions before the 1st respondent and the petitioner seeks for an expeditious disposal of the same.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

After hearing both sides, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3(d), P4(d) and P5(d) revision petitions submitted by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and respondents 5 to 7.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top