SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23708

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
NOORJAHAN – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10372 OF 2026



Important Points

The Regional Transport Authority must comply with appellate directions regarding permit renewals.

Subject

Transport Law - Permit Regulation

Headnote

The petitioner challenged the revocation of her stage carriage permit by the Regional Transport Authority. The State Transport Appellate Tribunal set aside the revocation and remanded for fresh consideration. Following compliance with the Tribunal's order, the case was disposed, allowing for future challenges. The court found that fresh orders were communicated to the petitioner after prior directives from the Tribunal.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.LAVARAJ M.G.
For the Respondents: SMT.SURYA BINOY

Table of Content
1. revocation of permit contested. (Para 1)
2. submission for fresh orders. (Para 2)
3. compliance noted and case concluded. (Para 3)
4. petitioner may challenge future orders. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner states that the renewal of the permit granted in respect of her stage carriage operating on the route Nemmara - Kozhinjampara was revoked by the Regional Transport Authority. The petitioner challenged the same in appeal before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal and the Tribunal, by Ext.P1, set aside the order of the Regional Transport Authority and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Regional Transport Authority has not passed fresh orders in compliance with Ext.P1.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Government Pleader.

3. Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the learned Senior Government Pleader submitted that the Regional Transport Authority has passed fresh orders pursuant to Ext.P1 in the meeting held on 23.09.2025 and the same was communicated to the petitioner on 25.10.2025.

4. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of. However, it will be open to the petitioner to challenge the order, if aggrieved, in accordance with law.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top