Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
NOORJAHAN – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revocation of permit contested. (Para 1) |
| 2. submission for fresh orders. (Para 2) |
| 3. compliance noted and case concluded. (Para 3) |
| 4. petitioner may challenge future orders. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner states that the renewal of the permit granted in respect of her stage carriage operating on the route Nemmara - Kozhinjampara was revoked by the Regional Transport Authority. The petitioner challenged the same in appeal before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal and the Tribunal, by Ext.P1, set aside the order of the Regional Transport Authority and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Regional Transport Authority has not passed fresh orders in compliance with Ext.P1.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Government Pleader.
3. Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the learned Senior Government Pleader submitted that the Regional Transport Authority has passed fresh orders pursuant to Ext.P1 in the meeting held on 23.09.2025 and the same was communicated to the petitioner on 25.10.2025.
4. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of. However, it w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
