Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23723

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
RAMACHANDRAN R. – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1149 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.BIJU BALAKRISHNAN, SMT.V.S.RAKHEE, SMT.K.J.GISHA, SMT.AKSHAYA S.NAIR, SHRI.JAYAKUMAR C., SMT.SANDRA SUNNY OTTA
For the Respondents: SHRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM

A writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous if the petitioner's claims or requests are no longer viable.

Headnote:The court analyzed the petition where the petitioner contended it had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission, reflecting on procedural aspects relevant to the dismissal of cases under similar circumstances. The final ruling rendered the petition dismissed for being infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. Submission accepted and this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23723

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JRAMACHANDRAN R. – AppellantVersusTHE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – RespondentWP(C) NO. 1149 OF 2026

A writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous if the petitioner's claims or requests are no longer viable.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
RAMACHANDRAN R. – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1149 OF 2026