SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23984

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
PHILIP CHACKO M – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 11893 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.V.N.HARIDAS, SHRI.SAIFUDEEN T.S, SMT.B.SHAMEERA, SMT.NIMISHAMOL SASIDHARAN, SHRI.UMESH M.
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Mandatory compliance timelines for administrative decisions under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ directing the respondent to consider the Ext.P3 Form 6 application under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. The court directed the 4th respondent to submit a report within one month and the 2nd respondent to consider the application expediently within five months. The petitioner is to provide the certified copy of the judgment for compliance.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top