SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23994

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
MUHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
1 JAMEELA, 2 LAILA, 3 ABOOBACKAR, 4 AYISHA @ AYISHABEEVI E.A – Respondent
FAO NO. 37 OF 2026(FILING NO)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SUSHANTH.J., SHRI.MOHAMMED NIHAD, SHRI.GIMMY P ANTONY

The court affirmed the appellant's right to withdraw the appeal while maintaining the option to pursue further legal remedies.

Headnote:The appellant moved to withdraw the appeal in FAO No. 37 of 2026 against the order dated 27.01.2026 in IA 1/2026 in OS No. 185 of 2020. The court determined that the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn while preserving the appellant's right to seek further remedies. The key issue involved the appellant's right to withdraw the appeal without prejudice.

JUDGMENT

Learned Counsel for the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the appellant to pursue appropriate remedies.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top