SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23997

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
M/S.MANJOORAN ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
MARTIN DAVIS – Respondent
OP(C) NO.248 OF 2026|EA 1/2026|EP NO.139 OF 2015



Important Points

Court ordered that proceedings shall not be disrupted while reviewing pending applications in execution petitions.

Subject

Civil - Execution Proceedings

Headnote

The judgment discusses the petition for a direction to the Sub Court to dispose of an application which aims to prevent any premature orders in ongoing proceedings. The court found no objections from the respondents regarding the application. Consequently, the application was allowed with a directive to the Sub Court to address it before any further orders.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL, SRI.S.SREEDEV, SRI.RONY JOSE, SHRI.LEO LUKOSE, SRI.KAROL MATHEWS SEBASTIAN ALENCHERRY, SHRI.DERICK MATHAI SAJI, SHRI.KARAN SCARIA ABRAHAM, SHRI.RINOY INNOCENT, SHRI.AADITHYA S.R.
For the Respondents: SHRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY

JUDGMENT

The prayer in this Original Petition is for a direction to the Sub Court, North Paravur to dispose of Ext.P11 application, E.A. No.1 of 2026 in E.P. No.139 of 2015 in O.S. No.171 of 2009. There is also a prayer to withhold passing any orders, recording satisfaction, settlement, adjustment or dismissal of E.P. No.139 of 2015 before consideration of E.A.

No.1 of 2026.

2. The respondents appeared through counsel.

The respondents have no objection regarding consideration of Ext.P11 E.A.

In the above circumstances, the Original Petition is allowed. There will be a direction to the Sub Court, North Paravur to hear and dispose of E.A. No.1 of 2026 in E.P. No.139 of 2015 in O.S. No.171 of 2009 before passing any orders, recording satisfaction of decree or any settlement.

The parties are free to seek advancement of proceedings to an early date before the vacation and if such an application is filed, the same shall be considered favourably.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top