Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23999

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. Ravi, J
BHAGYAM – Appellant
Versus
YASODHA – Respondent
OP(C) NO.981 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.B. Subramanyan, Manu Vyasaan Peter

A party may withdraw an original petition with liberty to file a fresh petition under the court's discretion.

Headnote:The petitioner's request for permission to withdraw the original petition with liberty to file a new petition is granted. The court dismisses the original petition as withdrawn, permitting the petitioner to initiate a fresh proceeding. This judgment reveals the procedural aspect of civil litigation allowing for withdrawal and re-filing.

JUDGMENT

When the case is taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the original petition with liberty to move a fresh original petition. Liberty is granted.

The Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 23999

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R. Ravi, JBHAGYAM – AppellantVersusYASODHA – RespondentOP(C) NO.981 OF 2026

A party may withdraw an original petition with liberty to file a fresh petition under the court's discretion.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. Ravi, J
BHAGYAM – Appellant
Versus
YASODHA – Respondent
OP(C) NO.981 OF 2026