Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
REJI ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the jurisdiction of the revenue divisional officer is questioned. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court discusses appropriate procedural avenues for appeal regarding agricultural land classification. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“a) issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Ext.P4.
b) to declare that the 2nd respondent has no power or authority to pass an order directing the agricultural officer to include the property in the data bank while considering a Form 6 application. c) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to reconsider Ext.P3 Form 6 application in the light of George Varghese v.
District Collector 2023(7)KHC 93 .
d) To declare that the subject property mentioned in Ext.P3 is not a paddy field as defined under section 2(XII) of the Act 28 of 2008.
e) dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents.
f) issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. “
(SIC)
2. The petitioner challenged Ext.P4 order passed by the 2nd re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
