SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24070

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
T.M.SULEKHA EASSA – Appellant
Versus
P.K.NAZAR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.Narayana V.B., Shri.C.Sivadas
For the Respondents: Sri.N.M.Madhu, Sri.K.Mohammed Faisal Naha, Smt.C.S.Rajani

Sathish Ninan, J.

Appeal rejected for non-payment of Balance Court Fee. The court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal shall be refunded to the appellants in terms of Section 66 of the C.F Act.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top