SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24081

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
HARIS CHERIYAN PARAMBIL – Appellant
Versus
FEDERAL BANK LTD. – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10520 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.E.A.BIJUMON, SHRI.SREEHARI V.
For the Respondents: SHRI.SUNIL SHANKER, SRI.K.N.SIVASANKARAN, SMT.VIDYA GANGADHARAN, SHRI.THOMAS GLAISON, SHRI.ASHLIN SAJU

A petitioner can withdraw a writ petition with the court's permission, leading to dismissal of the case.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: This court considers the procedural aspects of withdrawal as per procedural laws. Facts of the Case: The petitioner filed WP

(C) No. 10520 of 2026 seeking legal remedies against the respondent bank, which has been withdrawn.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner was granted permission to withdraw his petition.

Issues: The key question was whether the court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court noted that the permission was granted as requested by the petitioner’s counsel.

Result: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. Permission granted and this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

P. V. BALAKRISHNAN JUDGE scl APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 10520 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ADVOCATE COMMISSION NOTICE DATED 24.09.2025.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top