JUDGMENT

The permission sought for by the respective petitioners for display of the fireworks in connection with the events mentioned in the Writ Petitions is refused. In W.P.(C).No.12906/2026, Ext.P8 is the impugned Order, whereas it is Ext.P7 in W.P.(C).No.12805/2026.

2. The reasons stated in these rejection Orders are more or less the same; that is to say, the absence of a permanent magazine, the absence of a Risk Assessment and On-Site Emergency Plan by an agency approved by P.E.S.O. and lack of time for sampling. This court notice that these grounds are dealt with in several judgments issued by this Court, including Exts.P10 to P13 produced in W.P. (C).No.12906 of 2016. For the same set of reasons stated therein, the impugned Orders cannot be sustained and the same will stand set aside. There will be a direction to the District Collector to grant permission to the respective petitioners for display of fireworks, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The respective petitioners shall pro