SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24256

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHAFSEER.P.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2939 OF 2026 | L.P. No.2/2024 | ST No.297/2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH, SRI.PRAJIT RATNAKARAN, SMT.ANJU DONY
For the Respondents: SR PP SRI C S HRITHWIK

The Court permits the petitioner to surrender and seek bail, ensuring timely consideration of his application by the Trial Court.

Headnote:The petitioner, accused in L.P. No.2/2024 (S.T. No.297/2017) involving a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, was unable to appear before the Trial Court, leading to a non-bailable warrant being issued against him. The petitioner sought permission to surrender and apply for bail, which the Court permitted, directing that such applications be considered promptly upon his surrender. The Court emphasized the importance of timely application and consideration by the Trial Court.

Table of Content
1. accused requests bail and permission to surrender. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directs consideration of bail applications upon surrender. (Para 3)

ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in L.P. No.2/2024 (S.T.

No.297/2017) on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-V, Kannur, (Trial Court), which is registered on a complaint filed by the 2nd respondent alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act .

2. The petitioner has stated in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case that, the petitioner could not appear before the Trial Court, on the day the complaint was posted for his appearance, due to unavoidable circumstances. The petitioner has learnt that a non-bailable warrant has been issued against him, and the case has been transferred to the Long Pending Register. The petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the Trial Court and get himself enlarged on bail. However, the petitioner is apprehensive that his applications may not be considered on the date of surrender and he may be remanded to judicial custody. Hence, the Crl.M.C.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor On a consideration of the facts and materials on record, without expressing anything on the merits of the matter, I dispose of the Crl.M.C, by permitting the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court within ten days from today and file applications before the Trial Court to get himself enlarged on bail and to recall non-bailable warrant, after serving advance copies on the Public Prosecutor. If such applications are filed within the prescribed time period, the Trial Court is directed to consider the applications on the very same day the petitioner surrenders before the Trial Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top