Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24267
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
RACHEL THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
SHARMILA MARY JOSEPH IAS – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 336 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.32050 OF 2022
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ARUN.B.VARGHESE, SHRI.ALAN LALU JOHN
For the Respondents: SMT. SYLAJA S.L.,GP
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ARUN.B.VARGHESE, SHRI.ALAN LALU JOHN
For the Respondents: SMT. SYLAJA S.L.,GP
A contempt case can be closed upon the court determining that compliance with its previous directives has been achieved, allowing the petitioner to pursue further legal remedies if necessary.
Headnote:In contempt of court matter C.C. No. 336 of 2026, the High Court of Kerala reviewed the petition regarding compliance with prior orders. The petitioners had sought action against the Government for not adhering to court directives. The court noted compliance was achieved via order dated 23.03.2026. Subsequently, the case was closed without prejudice to further legal actions by petitioners. The judgment denotes the conclusion of the proceedings on 31.03.2026.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing summary and presence of counsel (Para 1) |
| 2. court noted compliance with previous orders (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that an order dated 23.3.2026 has been issued by the Government, purportedly in compliance with the directions issued by this Court.
In view of the afore, this contempt of court case would stand closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to challenge the afore order in accordance with law.
Sd/-
