SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24306

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
SINDHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7244 OF 2022



Important Points

Litigation becomes moot when no live issues remain for adjudication after actions have been executed.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Headnote

The court analyzed the procedural context surrounding WP

(C) No. 7244 of 2022. The petitioners contended that certain communications had not been duly executed; however, the respondents clarified that critical documents had been actioned, rendering the case moot. Therefore, the court found no valid grounds for proceeding, concluding that the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.SREEKUMAR
For the Respondents: SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3 submitted that, Exts.P4 and P5 have already been acted upon.

In such circumstances, nothing further survives for consideration in this writ petition and this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top