Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
RIJU K M – Appellant
Versus
SUB REGISTRAR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12701 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.ANUPAMA SUBRAMANIAN
For the Respondents: SRI. K. M. FAISAL

Petitioners may withdraw their writ petition with permission to file a fresh application, affirming procedural compliance.

Headnote:The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to refile it with necessary pleadings. The court granted the permission to withdraw, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn. The court's permission to withdraw is stated within the context of Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Code. The final outcome is the dismissal of the petition.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to file a fresh and proper writ petition with all necessary pleadings.

With the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JRIJU K M – AppellantVersusSUB REGISTRAR – RespondentWP(C) NO. 12701 OF 2026

Petitioners may withdraw their writ petition with permission to file a fresh application, affirming procedural compliance.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
RIJU K M – Appellant
Versus
SUB REGISTRAR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12701 OF 2026