Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.B. SNEHALATHA, J
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
AYANA PRASAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court approves appeals regarding compensation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. lack of response from specified parties. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments on adequacy of compensation. (Para 6 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. insurance company disputes compensation amount. (Para 7 , 23) |
| 5. assessment of injuries and their consequences. (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. re-assessment of awarded compensation. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. legal interpretation on insurance liability. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. final orders regarding compensation. (Para 31) |
JUDGMENT
These two appeals have been preferred from the award passed in OP(MV)No.775/2011 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Irinjalakuda.
2. MACA No.3159/2016 is an appeal preferred by the claimant, whereas the MACA No.2103/2016 is an appeal preferred by the Insurance Company. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to in this appeal as the claimant and respondents as in the O.P.
3. Claimant filed the OP seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act , from R1 to R3, stating that on 01.06.2011 at 5.00 pm, while she was travelling in an autorickshaw bearing Reg.No.KL-8/G 6686 driven by the 1st respondent an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
