SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24517

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
MUFEEDA JEELANI PASHA – Appellant
Versus
CALICUT CITY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.D2777 – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2581 OF 2025



Important Points

Failure to comply with court ordered deposit justifies dismissal of the original petition.

Subject

Civil - Original Petition

Headnote

The judgment analyzes the non-deposit of a directed amount in an original petition. Finding that the petitioner failed to meet the court's order, the court concludes that dismissal is warranted. The court’s ruling pivots on the petitioner’s inaction regarding financial obligations as decreed.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.I.SAGEER, SRI.MUHAMMED YASIL, SRI.K.M.NASARUDHEEN, SRI.SURYANATH S.
For the Respondents: SRI.B.S.SWATHI KUMAR, SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN, SRI.HARISANKAR N UNNI

JUDGMENT

When the case is taken up, the counsel for the respondents submitted that the amount of Rs.4 lakhs which was directed to be deposited has not been deposited by the petitioner.

In the above circumstances, no further orders can be granted in this original petition. The original petition is dismissed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top