Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24517

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
MUFEEDA JEELANI PASHA – Appellant
Versus
CALICUT CITY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.D2777 – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2581 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.I.SAGEER, SRI.MUHAMMED YASIL, SRI.K.M.NASARUDHEEN, SRI.SURYANATH S.
For the Respondents: SRI.B.S.SWATHI KUMAR, SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN, SRI.HARISANKAR N UNNI

Failure to comply with court ordered deposit justifies dismissal of the original petition.

Headnote:The judgment analyzes the non-deposit of a directed amount in an original petition. Finding that the petitioner failed to meet the court's order, the court concludes that dismissal is warranted. The court’s ruling pivots on the petitioner’s inaction regarding financial obligations as decreed.

JUDGMENT

When the case is taken up, the counsel for the respondents submitted that the amount of Rs.4 lakhs which was directed to be deposited has not been deposited by the petitioner.

In the above circumstances, no further orders can be granted in this original petition. The original petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24517

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R.RAVI, JMUFEEDA JEELANI PASHA – AppellantVersusCALICUT CITY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.D2777 – RespondentOP(C) NO. 2581 OF 2025

Failure to comply with court ordered deposit justifies dismissal of the original petition.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
MUFEEDA JEELANI PASHA – Appellant
Versus
CALICUT CITY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.D2777 – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2581 OF 2025