IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
K.RAJESH – Appellant
Versus
V.A SAROJINI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for time to vacate (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. conditions for extension (Para 3) |
EASWARAN S., J ---------------------------------
R.S.A No.154 of 2026 ---------------------------------
Dated this the 26th day of March, 2026 JUDGMENT After hearing the appeal for some time, the learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that his client is not in a position to deposit a sum of Rs.19,13,600/- (Rupees Nineteen lakh thirteen thousand six hundred only) and therefore requested this Court to grant sufficient time to vacate the premises. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that his client needs time till 31.05.2026 to vacate the decree schedule property. Learned counsel for the 6th respondent - auction purchaser though opposed, this Court is of the view that the request is only reasonable.
2. However, the learned counsel for the 6th respondent also requests this Court that in case this Court is inclined to grant time till 31.05.2026 to the appellant to vacate premises, he be directed to pay the use and occupation charges from the date of confirmation of the auction till he vacates the premises.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant, Sri.Abdul Raoof, again requested
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.