Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
DIVON GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner was appointed as l.d. clerk amid controversies regarding a competing candidate's promotion. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations regarding the impact of examination schedules during covid. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court ruling on the legitimacy of the petitioner's promotion due to government clarifications. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final court order voiding previous adverse decisions against the petitioner. (Para 7) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner was appointed as L.D. Clerk with the 5th respondent herein, and the 6th respondent was also appointed by the 5th respondent as L.D Store Keeper. The petitioner was appointed earlier than the 6th respondent. The appointment of the petitioner as above was approved, whereas the appointment of the 6th respondent was not approved since there were no notifications issued by the 5th respondent in the matter. However, only a warning was issued at Ext.P6 by the Government for carrying out the appointment of the 6th respondent as above. Later, a vacancy arose in the post of Senior/U.D Clerk. The petitioner applied for the afore post, and he also had to clear the departmental tests. The departmental test was notified to be conducted with
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
