SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24830

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHAFSEER.P.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2894 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH, SRI.PRAJIT RATNAKARAN, SMT.ANJU DONY
For the Respondents: SR PP SMT SEETHA S

The court permits an accused to surrender and stipulates swift consideration of bail applications under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Headnote:Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the petitioner faces a complaint for non-appearance before the Judicial First Class Magistrate. The petitioner, unable to appear due to unavoidable circumstances, moves the Court to allow surrender and seek bail. The Court allows the petition and orders the Trial Court to consider bail applications promptly upon surrender.

Table of Content
1. details of complaint and circumstances surrounding the petitioner's non-appearance. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's permission for the petitioner to surrender and file for bail. (Para 3)

ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in L.P. No.2/2018 (S.T.

No.106/2017) on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-IV, Kannur, (Trial Court), which is registered on a complaint filed by the 2nd respondent alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act .

2. The petitioner has stated in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case that, the petitioner could not appear before the Trial Court, on the day the complaint was posted for his appearance, due to unavoidable circumstances. The petitioner has learnt that a non-bailable warrant has been issued against him, and the case has been transferred to the Long Pending Register. The petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the Trial Court and get himself enlarged on bail. However, the petitioner is apprehensive that his applications may not be considered on the date of surrender and he may be remanded to judicial custody. Hence, the Crl.M.C.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor On a consideration of the facts and materials on record, without expressing anything on the merits of the matter, I dispose of the Crl.M.C, by permitting the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court within ten days from today and file applications before the Trial Court to get himself enlarged on bail and to recall non-bailable warrant, after serving advance copies on the Public Prosecutor. If such applications are filed within the prescribed time period, the Trial Court is directed to consider the applications on the very same day the petitioner surrenders before the Trial Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top