SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24863

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
C.O.JOSE, RADHAKRISHNAN VK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 29731 OF 2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.SREEKUMAR (SR.), SMT.V.A.HARITHA, SMT.MARY RESHMA GEORGE, SMT.P.M.MAZNA MANSOOR
For the Respondents: SHRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM, SMT.NEENA JACOB, R.RENJITH

A writ petition can be dismissed as infructuous, leaving open the contentions raised by the petitioners.

Headnote:This judgment evaluates a writ petition (WP

(C) NO. 29731 OF 2016) wherein the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous, leading to the court's dismissal of the writ petition. The learned court determined that the dismissal does not impact the contentions raised by the petitioners, which remain open for future consideration.

Table of Content
1. the matter became infructuous, leading to dismissal. (Para 1)
2. court left contentions open after dismissal. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

2.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. The contentions are left open.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top