SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 24938

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
ABDUL LATHEEF K. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11308 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: AMBADI MURALI, NIDHIN K.N., NEERAJ T.N., GOPIKRISHNAN R.
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA

Passport corrections must consider the statutory documents and applicable office memoranda.

Headnote:The petitioner, holder of Indian Passport No. Y9543908, contested the incorrect date of birth listed therein. The Court analyzed the law regarding passport issuance and corrections under the Office Memorandum dated 26.11.2015. Ultimately, the Court directed the petitioner to submit a new application for correction to the respondent with a timeline for consideration.

Table of Content
1. date of birth correction in passports (Para 1)
2. application procedure for corrections (Para 2 , 3)
3. duty of respondents to consider applications (Para 4)

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is the holder of an Indian Passport (Ext.P1). According to the petitioner, his actual date of birth is 07.02.1976 as evident from Exts.P5 to P9 documents. However, the same was wrongly shown as 06.04.1973 in Ext.P1. Though the petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 representation before 2nd respondent, it is not so far considered. The petitioner states that, as per Ext. P4 Office Memorandum, exemption is granted for correction of the date of birth in cases where the applicant was a minor at the time of issuance of the passport. Accordingly, the petitioner has filed this writ petition for the following reliefs:

1. Issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents to take appropriate steps to correct the date of birth of the petitioner in Passport No. Y9543908 from 06.04.1973 to 07.02.1976, based on the statutory documents produced as Exhibits P5 to 9;

2. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit P2 representation submitted by the petitioner, in the light of Exhibit P4 Office Memorandum dated 26.11.2015, within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court;

3. Declare that the petitioner is entitled to have his correct date of birth (07.02.1976) in his passport, in light of the entries in the statutory records issued by competent authorities;

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for the respondents.

3. The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has not submitted the application in the prescribed format.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will submit a fresh application for correction of date of birth in Ext.P1 Passport.

In the light of the said submission, it will be open to the petitioner to make appropriate application with all relevant documents before the 3rd respondent for correction of date of birth in the passport and for its reissue. If such an application is received, the 3rd respondent shall consider the same, in accordance with law, taking into consideration Ext.P4 office memorandum, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month thereafter.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top