JUDGMENT

The appellants/defendants have approached this Court, being aggrieved by the reversal of the judgment and decree in O.S. No.1361 of 2004 rendered by the Additional Munisiff Court-II, Ernakulam, by the Additional District Court -I, Ernakulam in A.S. No.363 of 2009.

2. The plaintiffs sued the defendants in a suit for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from causing any obstructions to the plaintiffs in the construction of a compound wall on the eastern boundary and putting up a gate on the southern side of the plaint B schedule pathway, and also from trespassing into the plaint B schedule pathway and interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment therein. The appellants/defendants resisted the suit, contending that the description of the plaint A and B schedule properties is incorrect and that the plaintiffs have no right over the western boundary of the 1^st defendant’s property. They denied the allegation of atte