Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
BINDU @ BINDU K.S. – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the maintenance application and jurisdiction issues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the enforcement of the maintenance order. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on jurisdiction and enforcement of maintenance orders. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. conclusions on enforcement jurisdiction of maintenance orders. (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
Revision petitioner No.1 is the wife of the respondent. Revision petitioner No.2 is the daughter born to her in the wedlock with the respondent. The petitioners filed an application seeking maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C before the Family Court, Thrissur, which was transferred to the Family Court, Kunnamkulam, pursuant to an administrative order. As per order dated 13.01.2025, the Family Court, Kunnamkulam awarded maintenance to the petitioners at the rate of Rs.6,000/- per month to petitioner No.1 and Rs.5,000/- per month to petitioner No.2. The petitioners filed execution petition under Section 128 Cr.P.C. before the Family Court, Kunnamkulam, as C.M.P. (Ex.)
No.116/2025 in M.C. No.118/2023. The Chief Ministerial Officer of the Court made the following notes on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
