Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 25267
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J
MANESH KUMAR T G – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF BARODA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13192 OF 2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.A.VINOD
For the Respondents: SRI. NAGARAJ NARAYANAN, SC
Court directed bank to consider request for removal of movables from possessed premises within two weeks.
Headnote:The petitioners sought a direction for consideration of their request under relevant banking regulations for removal of movable articles from premises possessed by the respondent bank. The court examined the request submitted as Ext.P1. The court directed consideration of the request after hearing the petitioners. The sole issue was whether the respondent should consider the petitioners' request for removal of movables. The court found it appropriate to direct expeditious disposal based on facts and circumstances. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to consider and dispose of Ext.P1 within two weeks after hearing the petitioners.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of counsel completed. (Para 1) |
| 2. prayer for considering removal request. (Para 2) |
| 3. direction for two-week disposal after hearing. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.
2. The only prayer sought for by the petitioners is to consider Ext.P1 request made by the petitioners to the respondent, regarding removal of movable articles situated in the premises which was taken possession by the bank.
3. Hence, considering the facts and circumstances of this case, there shall be a direction to the respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P1 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioners.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
