SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 25308

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Soumen Sen, CJ, Syam Kumar V.M., J
ALL KERALA BAR HOTELS & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (CITU) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(PIL) NO. 42 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.B.N.HASKAR, SRI.B.K.GOPALAKRISHNAN, SHRI.KRISHNAKUMAR S., SMT.NIKITHA P., SHRI.ROSHITH ROSHAN
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI.RADHAKRISHNAN R., SHRI.B.V.BALAKRISHNAN, SMT.SREELAKSHMI P.R., SMT.LATTISHA THERASA THOMAS, SMT.CHRISTIL SHAJI

Stakeholder consensus on flexi bar hours and labour law compliance disposes PIL challenging liquor rule amendments.

Headnote:Amendments to Sections 24 and 29 of the Abkari Act via Government Notification substituted Rule 28(1) of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953, varying bar hotel working hours. Petitioner challenged on grounds of violating Minimum Wages Act, labour laws, and Articles 47, 48 of Constitution. Court directed stakeholder meeting, noting resolutions on flexi timings, labour compliance, and overtime. Issues framed as violation of wage norms and constitutional mandates. Ratio: Stakeholder meeting resolved grievances via flexi hours (8pm-12am, etc.), ensured Minimum Wages Act and Kerala Shops Act compliance with overtime at twice rate; Labour inspections mandated. Court observed prior directive against coercive action. Writ petition disposed of as grievances redressed.

Table of Content
1. challenges to abkari act amendments on working hours (Para 1 , 2)
2. hearing arguments and prior stakeholder directive (Para 3 , 4)
3. meeting resolutions on flexi timings and labour benefits (Para 5 , 6)
4. grievances redressed via compliance measures (Para 7 , 8)
5. pil disposed post resolutions and prior orders (Para 9 , 10)

J U D G M E N T

Syam Kumar.V.M.,J.

This W.P(PIL) is filed interalia challenging the amendments made to Section 24 and 29 of the Abkari Act vide Ext.P2 Government Notification, which substituted Rule 28 Sub- Rule (1) of the Foreign Liquor Rules , 1953, whereby the working hours of Bar and Hotels in the State of Kerala was varied.

inter alia

2. The petitioner challenges Ext.P2 on the premise that the same is violative of the norms that are in force under the Minimum Wages Act as well as the Labour Act, which envisages the working time of employees. It is also submitted that the said variation militates against the mandates of Article 47 and 48 of the Constitution of India .

3. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. We had vide order dated 26.02.2026, directed the Government to convene a meeting of all the stakeholders to resolve the issue.

5. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Ms.Vinitha B., the learned Senior Government Pleader brings to our notice an affidavit filed by the Under Secretary, Labour and Skills Department, Government Secretariat, producing therewith Annexure R7(a), which is a Minutes of the meeting that had been convened as directed by this Court in the interim order.

6. It is noted that all the stakeholders involved in the matter had participated in the meeting and the meeting had resolved the following:

1. ഓരോ(cid:3)(cid:4) ബാ(cid:4)ർ രോ(cid:7)(cid:4)ട്ടൽ ലൈ(cid:11)സെ(cid:13)ൻ(cid:13)(cid:15)ക്കും(cid:17)(cid:18) (cid:3)(cid:4)വി(cid:15)സെ(cid:11) 8 മണി(cid:15) മ(cid:17)തൽ (cid:3)(cid:4)ത്രിത(cid:15) 12 മണി(cid:15)വിസെ(cid:3)യു(cid:17)ള്ള (cid:13)മയുത്തി(cid:15)നി(cid:15)ടയു(cid:15)ൽ, (cid:3)(cid:4)വി(cid:15)സെ(cid:11) 8 മണി(cid:15) മ(cid:17)തൽ (cid:3)(cid:4)ത്രിത(cid:15) 10 മണി(cid:15) വിസെ(cid:3) അസെ(cid:30)ങ്കി(cid:15)ൽ (cid:3)(cid:4)വി(cid:15)സെ(cid:11) 10 മണി(cid:15) മ(cid:17)തൽ (cid:3)(cid:4)ത്രിത(cid:15) 12 വിസെ(cid:3) എന്നി(cid:15)ങ്ങസെനിയു(cid:17)ള്ള (cid:13)മയു(cid:18) (Flexi time) സെത(cid:3)സെ#ട(cid:17)ക്കും(cid:17)വി(cid:4)ൻ അനി(cid:17)മത(cid:15) നിൽകു(cid:17)ന്നി

കു(cid:4)(cid:3)%(cid:18) പ(cid:3)(cid:15)ഗണി(cid:15)ക്കും(cid:4)വി(cid:17)ന്നിത(cid:4)ണി( 2 ബാ(cid:4)ർ രോ(cid:7)(cid:4)ട്ട(cid:11)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:17)കുളി(cid:15)സെ(cid:11) ജീ+വിനിക്കും(cid:4)ർക്കും( Labour Act, Minimum Wages Act ത്രിപകു(cid:4)(cid:3)മ(cid:17)ള്ള ആനി(cid:17)കു-(cid:11)%ങ്ങൾ അനി(cid:17)വിദി(cid:15)ക്കുംണി(cid:18). അധി(cid:15)കു (cid:13)മയു(cid:18) രോജീ(cid:4)(cid:11)(cid:15) സെ1യ്യു(cid:17)ന്നി സെത(cid:4)ഴി(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:4)ളി(cid:15)കുൾക്കും( ഓവിർ ലൈട(cid:18) അ(cid:11)വിൻ(cid:13)( അനി(cid:17)വിദി(cid:15)ക്കുംണി(cid:18). ഇക്കും(cid:4)(cid:3)%ത്തി(cid:15)ൽ സെത(cid:4)ഴി(cid:15)ൽ വികു(cid:17)പ്പ്( ആവിശ്യ%മ(cid:4)യു നിടപട(cid:15)കുൾ (cid:13)7+കു(cid:3)(cid:15)രോക്കുംണ്ടത(cid:4)ണി(.

3 സെ(cid:13)ക്കുംൻഡ്(‌(cid:13)( മദി%ത്തി(cid:15)നി(സെ; വി(cid:15)ല്പനി= തടയു(cid:17)ന്നിത(cid:15)നി(cid:4)യു(cid:15) ബാ+വിരോ;ജീ‌(cid:13)( ( ഔട്ട( ലൈ(cid:11)റ്റു(cid:17)കുളി(cid:17)സെട ത്രിപവിർത്തിനി (cid:13)മയു(cid:18) (cid:3)(cid:4)വി(cid:15)സെ(cid:11) 8 മ(cid:17)തൽ (cid:3)(cid:4)ത്രിത(cid:15) 9 വിസെ(cid:3) ആയു(cid:15) വിർധി(cid:15)പ്പ്(cid:15)ക്കും(cid:17)ന്നിത(

പ(cid:3)(cid:15)ഗണി(cid:15)ക്കും(cid:4)വി(cid:17)ന്നിത(cid:4)ണി(

7. In view of the said resolutions arrived at the joint meeting wherein all the stakeholders were participated, the apprehensions and grievances as expressed by the petitioner in the W.P(PIL) already stands substantially redressed.

8. We also take note of paragraph 4 and 5 of the affidavit filed by the Under Secretary, Labour and Skills Department, which is reiterated below:

“4. The Additional Chief Secretary (Taxes) thereafter communicated th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top