Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
Jekson Iype – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Executive Officer The Kerala Motor Workers Welfare Fund Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner paid welfare fund for ineligible employee (Para 1) |
| 2. heard counsel and reviewed counter affidavit (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. direct consideration of refund application expeditiously (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is stated to be the owner of a mini bus. He had remitted the welfare fund for two persons to the 2nd respondent herein, under the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund . The petitioner states that the 2nd respondent directed him to make payment in respect of three employees. Based on that direction, he remitted a further amount of Rs. 43,400/-, as evidenced by Exts. P1 to P4 receipts. However, according to the petitioner, the 1st respondent, pursuant to Exts. P6 and P8 informed him that the third employee, namely Abraham V.N., could not be included in the welfare fund. On account of this, the petitioner states that the payment effected as above requires to be refunded to him. The petitioner has also submitted Ext.P10 application before the respondent Board seeking the afore prayer. It is in such circumstances that the petitioner has approached this Court since Ext.P10 submitted as above has not been acted upon by the respondents.
2. I have heard S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
