SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 25363

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
CHAKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER UNDER THE PADDY LAND AND WET LAND ACT – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12910 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY
For the Respondents: GP SMT DEEPA V

Court directs time-bound consideration of paddy land conversion application under Section 27A of Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land Act.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a Form 6 application under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, seeking conversion of paddy land. The court directed expeditious consideration of the application. The primary determination was to issue directions for processing the application within specified timelines. The issue framed was the delay in disposing the pending Form 6 application under Section 27A. The ratio decidendi emphasized the need for time-bound disposal by authorities, directing the Village Officer to report within one month and the Authorized Officer to decide within five months post-report. The writ petition is disposed of with directions to the 4th respondent to submit report within one month and 1st respondent to consider application within five months from receipt of report.

Table of Content
1. prayer for mandamus directing consideration of form 6 application under section 27a. (Para 1 , 2)
2. hearing of counsel and government pleader. (Para 3)
3. directions for time-bound processing of conversion application. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with following prayers:

i. To issue a writ of mandamus order or other appropriate writ or direction directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose Ext. P2 Form 6 Application filed underSection 27Aof the Act which is numbered as 10/2026/105370 dated 05.03.2026 forthwith.

ii. To issue any other writs order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit on the facts and circumstances of the case.

iii. Petitioner may be permitted to dispense with the filing of translation of the vernacular documents (SIC)

2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P2 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P2 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised O period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O to consider the Ext.P2 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of five months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 1st respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top