Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
RUMSY RASHEED – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY (GENERAL) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 4426 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for return of mortgage documents post-loan repayment. (Para 1) |
| 2. bank consents to return deeds and cancel gehan. (Para 2) |
| 3. writ allowed on consent; deeds returned, gehan cancelled. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent bank to return the documents deposited by the petitioner for the purpose of creating a mortgage to secure the repayment of a loan that has been repaid in full. The petitioner also prays that the 'Gehan' executed by the petitioner may be cancelled. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that the bank has no objection to returning the title deeds to the petitioner, and the 'Gehan' executed by the petitioner can also be cancelled.
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank and taking into consideration the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent bank, this writ petition is ordered on consent, and it is directed that the title deeds deposited by the petitioner for creating the mortgage shall be returned to the petitioner, and the 'Gehan' executed by the petitioner shall also be cancelled, forthwith.
The writ petition is ordered accordingly.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
