IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SHANOOB M.S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of dv act maintenance proceedings and appeals (Para 2) |
| 2. direction for time-bound disposal of main case (Para 3) |
J U D G M E N T
(Dated this the 31st day of March, 2026)
The respondents in M.C No. 18 of 2021 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Mattancherry, filed this Crl.Rev.Pet underSection 438and 442 ofBNSSagainst the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No. 454/2023 dated 17.12.2025, by which the learned Sessions Judge modified the order passed by the learned Magistrate in Crl.MP No. 510/2021.
2. The above M.C case was filed by the respondents under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (in short ‘the DV Act’). Along with the M.C she preferred an application under Section 23 of the DV Act seeking interim relief. The learned Magistrate directed the petitioner to pay interim maintenance at the rate of Rs. 50,000/- per month. It was reduced to Rs. 30,000/- in appeal.
3. Against the above appellate order, she preferred this Crl.Rev.Pet. As per Sub Section 2 of Section 438 of BNSS , the powers of revision conferred by Sub Section 1 shall not be exercised in relation to any interlocutory order passe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.