SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 34796

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
SIDDIQUE.P.S. – Appellant
Versus
HUSINI – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.FRANKLIN CHELLATH

O R D E R

The petitioners herein suffered an order in M.C.No.10/2017 passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ernakulam in a proceeding under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 . They were restrained from committing any act of domestic violence, restrained from dispossessing the 1st respondent herein from the petition scheduled property, directed to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.2,500/- per month and were also directed to surrender the vacant possession of the building within three months from that date. Aggrieved by the above order, the petitioners moved the appellate court by preferring Crl. Appeal No.201/2018. The grievance of the petitioners is that even though they have filed an application for stay, the court below has not passed any order on it. The apprehension of the petitioners is that since the period for surrender has got elapsed in the meanwhile, there is a possibility to they being forcefully dispossessed.

2. Of course, the petitioners are entitled for an early disposal of the appeal, in the light of absence of stay. Having Crl. M. C. No. 3296 of 2018 2 considered the limited prayer sought by the petitioners and the relief that is propos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top