SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 20660

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N. NAGARESH, J
BERNAD – Appellant
Versus
ELSY JOSE – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.P.V.BABY SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH R1 BY ADV. SRI.JOSHY THANNICKAMATTAM R3 BY ADV. SRI.LAL GEORGE

JUDGMENT

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Dated this the 10th day of July, 2020

The petitioners in OP(MV) No.934/2002 on the files of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Irinjalakuda are in appeal invoking Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , aggrieved by Award dated 15.03.2008.

2. An accident occurred on 16.04.2002 at Kandarampady on the North Paravur – Varapuzha public road, involving motorcycle No.KL-08S-7859. The appellants are lelgal heirs of the pillion rider of the motorcycle. The pillion rider died in the accident. The rider of the motorcycle filed OP(MV) No.932/2002 under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 . The appellants-legal heirs of the pillion rider, filed OP(MV) No.934/2002 under Section 166 of the Act.

3. The insurance company alone contested the claim. The other respondents remained ex parte. The insurance company alleged that the accident occurred due to the negligence on the part of the petitioner in OP(MV) No.932/2002 himself, who was the rider of the motorcycle.

4. The appellants produced Exts.A1 to A8 and the insurance company produced Ext.B1 copy of insurance policy. The Tribunal found that the accident occurred due to the rashness and negligence on the pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top