SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24365

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J
V.SANKARAN KUTTY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
MR.V.A.MUHAMMED, MR.K.E.HAMZA

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner retired from service as Assistant Teacher from the A.U.P.School, Kulappully. Gong by Ext.P1, retirement benefits have been sanctioned to him. The D.C.R.G amount has not been disbursed so far which has prompted the petitioner to file this writ petition. After the retirement of the petitioner, he was issued with Exts.P2 and P3 by the Headmaster of the School and the Assistant Educational Officer with regard to some personal loans availed by him. By Ext.P4, he replied that he has not executed any consent to recover any loan amount from the D.C.R.G payable to him.

2. The petitioner has got a case that he had taken personal loans from different banks by offering securities but, he has not given any written consent for recovering any of those amounts from the D.C.R.G to any of those creditors. He is relying upon the decision of this Court inSurendran v.Mavelikara Primary Co-op. Agrl.& R.D.Bank Ltd. [2005 (4) KLT 619], a copy of which is produced as Ext.P5, wherein the matter was disposed of taking a view that unless there is written consent by a Government employee for effecting recovery from D.C.R.G., no such recovery can be effected.

3. In the counter affida

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top