SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 25937

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J
Akash Revi – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1926 OF 2026|BAIL APPL. NO. 1927 OF 2026|CRIME NO.277/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ADITHYA RAJEEV, SMT.S.PARVATHI
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PP

Bail granted due to lack of incriminating materials, no antecedents, and completed investigation.

Headnote:The applications were filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail in connection with offences under Sections 138, 309(4), 308(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the accused wrongfully restrained, abducted, assaulted the informant, and committed extortion and robbery on 9.3.2026. The court considered the applicants' lack of criminal antecedents and near completion of investigation. The main issue was whether the applicants were entitled to bail given the allegations of intentional criminal acts. The court observed no materials connecting the applicants to the crime and no need for continued detention. The applications were allowed, directing release on bail subject to specified conditions.

Table of Content
1. bail applications under bnss section 483 for accused in crime. (Para 1 , 2)
2. heard counsel arguments on implication and entitlement. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER

These applications are filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant in B.A.No.1926/2026 is the accused No.3 and the applicant in B.A.No.1927/2026 is the accused No.2 in Crime No.277/2026 of Koyilandy Police Station, Kozhikode District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 138 , 309(4) and 308(2) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 9.3.2026 at 12.30 pm, the accused persons came in a car bearing registration No.KL 56 Z 1655, wrongfully restrained the bike bearing registration No.KL 56F 3268 driven by the first informant, abducted and assaulted him at a place called Madathil Thazhe. The accused persons committed extortion and robbery of money of the first informant and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri. Adithya Rajeev, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri. K.A. Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and they are not entitled to bail at this stage. 6. The applicants were remanded to judicial custody on 15.3.2026. The investigation is almost over. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicants is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top